venta: (Default)
[personal profile] venta
Return of an old rant:

I just called the Swan to book my car in for some work on Saturday. During my fifteen second conversation with the receptionist, she said "just bear with me a second" three times.

That's a whopping 12 bwm/minute, on average.
Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>

Date: 2004-12-15 01:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wimble.livejournal.com
Or, as a less irritating way of looking at it, only 3 seconds you had to bear with her.
Plus, at an estimate, another 2 seconds each time to say the phrase.
So that's 9 seconds gone.

How did you fill in the gaping 6 second void?

Date: 2004-12-15 02:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
The annoying thing was that on the first two occasions, I wasn't actually being asked to bear with her at all. It just seemed to be the equivalent of saying "er".

The third time it was more than a second, while she put me on hold and talked to the mechanic.

Thankyou so much.

Date: 2004-12-15 02:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lanfykins.livejournal.com
I hate losing the game.

Re: Thankyou so much.

Date: 2004-12-15 02:16 am (UTC)
chrisvenus: (Default)
From: [personal profile] chrisvenus
Then stop playing. Otherwise you'll just lose again.

Re: Thankyou so much.

Date: 2004-12-15 02:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lanfykins.livejournal.com
Apparently I'm not allowed to.

Re: Thankyou so much.

Date: 2004-12-15 02:19 am (UTC)
chrisvenus: (Default)
From: [personal profile] chrisvenus
They said that to me too. I'm not playing though. I could keep pointing out that you are losing until such a time as you get bored of that "gah!" feeling and decide to stop having that reaction. At that point you are no longer playing the game.

Re: Thankyou so much.

Date: 2004-12-15 02:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wimble.livejournal.com
What? Is she playing a game?

What's it take to make her lose?

Re: Thankyou so much.

Date: 2004-12-15 02:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
"A white hole"

Re: Thankyou so much.

Date: 2004-12-15 02:23 am (UTC)
chrisvenus: (Default)
From: [personal profile] chrisvenus
That should do the trick.

Re: Thankyou so much.

Date: 2004-12-15 02:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lanfykins.livejournal.com
I'm still in loss from the last time. I think I have to actually forget about the game before I can lose it again :)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com

Area of Vatican City: 0.44 km2

Number of Popes in Vatican City: 1 (usually)

Vatican City Pope density: 2.27 Popes/km2

Re: Thankyou so much.

Date: 2004-12-15 02:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wimble.livejournal.com
That's what I figured.

Re: Thankyou so much.

Date: 2004-12-15 02:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wimble.livejournal.com
So we won't see you back on this thread for the rest of the day?

In fact, every time you so much look at your friends page, you'll see [livejournal.com profile] venta's initial post, and that'll remind you why you shouldn't read the rest of the thread.

In fact, you'll probably worry about that, as soon as you think about looking at LJ. Which probably counts as a loss.

Have a nice, productive day!

Re: Thankyou so much.

Date: 2004-12-15 02:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
It was a Red Dwarf quote. Don't worry about it.
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
:)

I remember being delighted during a lecture on computer architecture (a rare occurrence) when the lecturer started talking about the speed of light being a limiting factor in laptop design.

He pointed out that, for the purpose, it was most useful to think of the speed of light as being "about a foot per nanosecond".
From: [identity profile] wimble.livejournal.com
the speed of light = 0.983571056 feet per nanosecond to be precise.

Yeah, I can see how "1" is a useful approximation.

Re: Thankyou so much.

Date: 2004-12-15 02:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wimble.livejournal.com
Ah. Senility, in my case :)

Re: Thankyou so much.

Date: 2004-12-15 03:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bateleur.livejournal.com
I'm so hoping that's just a pop culture quote I don't recognise !
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Er, why ? I don't follow.
What happens for nine days ? I'm not very well up on my popery.
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
How do you get infinite density rather than zero density for the nine days?
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
The foot/nanosecond thing kind of brings home the latency inherent to everyday experience, IYSWIM.
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Why does no pope = infinite popes ?

Or are you referring to the infinite number of popes-in-potentia ? In which case surely it isn't infinite, it's about 24, or however many redhatty guys there are in the College of Cardinals these days.
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
I think it's inaccurate.

0/x = 0, regardless of the value of x.

x/0 = infinity, regardless of the value of x.
From: [identity profile] onebyone.livejournal.com
Or for practical purposes in PC hardware, roughly 4 inches per clock cycle.
Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>

Profile

venta: (Default)
venta

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
212223 24252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 28th, 2025 01:23 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios