Page Summary
zotz - (no subject)
wimble.livejournal.com - (no subject)
bateleur.livejournal.com - (no subject)
venta.livejournal.com - (no subject)
venta.livejournal.com - (no subject)
wimble.livejournal.com - (no subject)
hjalfi.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lanfykins.livejournal.com - (no subject)
venta.livejournal.com - (no subject)
venta.livejournal.com - (no subject)
venta.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lanfykins.livejournal.com - (no subject)
bateleur.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lanfykins.livejournal.com - (no subject)
venta.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lanfykins.livejournal.com - (no subject)
killalla - Maitreya
venta.livejournal.com - Re: Maitreya
dmh.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2004-12-01 02:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-01 02:21 am (UTC)You've got me all curious/paranoid now.
no subject
no subject
Date: 2004-12-01 02:25 am (UTC)http://www.shareintl.org/
no subject
Date: 2004-12-01 02:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-01 02:30 am (UTC)Well, there's the fact that Maitreya has a changable, but "instantly recognisable" appearance. So there might be (gasp!) more than one person claiming the roll. But that looks more like a conspiracy to defraud (the worshippers), or the starting point for the defenders or the faithful to claim a conspiracy against them.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-01 02:37 am (UTC)I didn't tick The Box, and yet the results still say that 100% of recipients ticked it! There's obviously something sinister going on here --- it's a subtle brainwashing scheme that's using the hypnotic effects of clicking on carefully-spaced radio buttons on a web page to condition us to where goth clothes and claim we like the New Model Army!
no subject
Date: 2004-12-01 02:45 am (UTC)And did you have to make me lose it too?
no subject
Date: 2004-12-01 02:46 am (UTC)Ah!
That worried me for a moment :)
However.... the percentage is of the number of people who answered the question. So, since there's only one tickybox, 100% of people who answered that question ticked that box.
Whew.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-01 02:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-01 02:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-01 02:50 am (UTC)Bloody internet nicks, why can't people just use sensible, recognisable names? Like, err,
I'll shut up now...
no subject
Date: 2004-12-01 03:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-01 03:16 am (UTC)(And yes, my reason for being Lanfykins is indeed 'because Lanfear was taken'. Even though I ran out of stamina for the books a few years back. It's my online nick, damn it)
And thankyou. I suspected him of being the Joe of Librarian and Monsoon fame, but it's nice to be confirmed right :)
no subject
Date: 2004-12-01 03:24 am (UTC)No worries, you're making me look popular ;)
no subject
Date: 2004-12-01 03:47 am (UTC)And Monsoon was one of the Most Irritating NPCs Ever in Renaissance. And everything that went wrong for Artemisia was his fault, damn it! And not because she was a psycho or anything.
Maitreya
Date: 2004-12-01 03:53 am (UTC)Re: Maitreya
Date: 2004-12-01 03:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-01 09:03 am (UTC)