On Thursdays I am a man of my word
Nov. 11th, 2004 09:52 amSpot question for the day:
Without googling, does the following phrase mean anything to anybody ?
Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of the party.
Without googling, does the following phrase mean anything to anybody ?
Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of the party.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 01:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 02:00 am (UTC)It's a trigger phrase, isn't it? From a film, someone says it and people start doing stupid things, like crashing their cars into walls and killing presidential candidates? Or am I confusing it with The invisible worm that flies in the night?
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 02:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 02:02 am (UTC)But I'm sure it comes from something else, like the communist party manifesto or something like that.
Can I google for it now?
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 02:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 02:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 02:07 am (UTC)This trigger-for-sleeping-agents bit is a new one on me. That's not where I know it from.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 02:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 02:13 am (UTC)Moon on a stick!
I think that ‘the party’ is the communist party. But I cannot remember the original setting as I have heard it repeated so many times out of its orginal context.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 02:20 am (UTC)(Of course, whether they're right is a good question!)
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 02:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 02:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 02:24 am (UTC)I not 100% sure what it tests, though. I remember my godmother vaguely referring to it as "something to do with the home keys".
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 02:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 02:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 02:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 02:35 am (UTC)So "Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of the party." is what was always written.
I figured you probably didn't know it from my dad though. :)
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 02:36 am (UTC)It does seem to use most of the most-used keys, though. Perhaps that's it.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 02:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 02:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 02:39 am (UTC)Other than that, no.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 02:41 am (UTC)Not sure I've got you down as a BP fan, though :)
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 02:42 am (UTC)Well, nearly.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 02:45 am (UTC)Anyway, aren't you meant to keep your spare fingers on the home keys all the time when touch typing?
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 02:48 am (UTC)Yes, you are supposed to keep your fingers on the home keys. I don't. Do you ?
I noticed when typing that phrase the it was much easier to do so than it usually is. That it's mostly alternate hands, thus giving you time to re-locate after each keystroke, was the best explanation I could come up with in a hurry for why.