venta: (Default)
[personal profile] venta
Dull survey: does your web browser of choice support the data:// scheme, as defined in RFC 2397 ?

Quick check:

If you can see a little picture of a face here, the answer is "yes". If you see some form of red-x/image-not-available thing, that's a "no".

Larry

If you could comment, letting me know which browser you're using, that'd be great.

To save an immediate flurry of duplicate comments, IE6 doesn't support it :)

Date: 2004-08-13 03:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nalsa.livejournal.com
Yes: Firefox 0.9.

Yes

Date: 2004-08-13 03:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wechsler.livejournal.com
Mozilla 1.6
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

Date: 2004-08-13 03:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cardinalsin.livejournal.com
Nope: IE5.5

Yes

Date: 2004-08-13 03:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lambertbehnke.livejournal.com
Netscape 7.1
mostly due to being Mozilla 5.0

Date: 2004-08-13 03:51 am (UTC)
triskellian: (cartoon me ibook)
From: [personal profile] triskellian
Yes; Mozilla 1.7 under Windows XP.

Date: 2004-08-13 03:53 am (UTC)
diffrentcolours: (Default)
From: [personal profile] diffrentcolours
Yep, Mozilla Firefox 0.9.1 on Debian GNU/Linux.

I wouldn't be too surprised if it was Mozilla that generated the flurry of duplicate comments...

Date: 2004-08-13 03:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
And slightly relevantly:

Is it possible to get google to search for things which include non-alphanumerics ?

Searching for "data://" seems to be equivalent to searching for "data", which is not very helpful. Escaping the dots and slashes with a \ doesn't work.

Date: 2004-08-13 03:56 am (UTC)
chrisvenus: (Default)
From: [personal profile] chrisvenus
lynx just sees the alt tag, I'm afraid. :)
No idea whether this means it understands it or not. :)

Date: 2004-08-13 03:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wimble.livejournal.com
Opera 7.54: Yup.

Date: 2004-08-13 03:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mr-tom.livejournal.com
Safari can see it. :-)

Date: 2004-08-13 04:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davefish.livejournal.com
Netscape 7 (on Win NT) can see a face.
If the user gets sstonkingly drunk then multiple faces are visible. I don't think that this is a Netscape feature though.

Date: 2004-08-13 07:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chron-job.livejournal.com
Mozilla firefox 9.1 is all good, yo.

-= Me

Alas... No.

Date: 2004-08-13 07:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chron-job.livejournal.com
Alaso, Ob1 (Off by One, V 3.4a ) web browser does NOT!!!

Date: 2004-08-13 07:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_corpse_/
Konqueror 3.1-12 is a no.

Date: 2004-08-13 08:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] voratus.livejournal.com
Firefox 0.9.3 can.
I'm curious as to why one would actually use this, as it seems it can only do the same thing that other code can currently do.

Date: 2004-08-16 02:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] broadmeadow.livejournal.com
I'm sure you have these answers by now, but I've been away for a fortnight and wanted to make it clear I am still about!

XP: IE6: No; Opera: yes
Debian Linux: Mozilla 1.0: yes

Profile

venta: (Default)
venta

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
212223 24252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 28th, 2025 05:49 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios